ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Patient Perspectives on Tic-Related Impairment: A Qualitative Examination.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Historically, researchers and clinicians have assumed that patients engage and initiate treatment for Tourette syndrome to reduce tic severity. As a result, current gold-standard assessment methods and intervention studies focus on global tic reduction. However, initial community-engaged work suggests that patients seek tic treatment for reasons beyond symptom reduction (e.g., impairment), and a host of previous research has shown an inconclusive relationship between tic severity and impairment. The aim of this study was to qualitatively examine patient-reported tic-related impairment using an open-ended prompt exploring the ways that tics get in the way or make life hard. Methods: Data were collected from 2 treatment trials examining various methods of delivering Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics. In total, 69 participants aged 8-57 years were included in this study. Responses to prompts were coded using an inductive, iterative approach by 3 researchers with expertise in tic disorders. Results: Six major themes (social interference, task interference, physical experiences, tic-related emotional distress, activity restriction, and sleep interference/fatigue) and 14 minor themes were extracted from the data. Discussion: Results represent an initial step in identifying, measuring, and addressing patient-centered goals in tic treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.