Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180826›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Minimizing unnecessary tax audits using multi-objective hyperparameter tuning of XGBoost with focal loss.

Ivan P Malashin, Igor S Masich, Vadim S Tynchenko, Andrei P Gantimurov, Vladimir A Nelyub, Aleksei S Borodulin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ivan P MalashinArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Igor S MasichArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Vadim S TynchenkoArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Andrei P GantimurovArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir A NelyubArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Aleksei S BorodulinArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a machine learning (ML) approach for detecting non-compliance in companies' tax data. The dataset, consisting of over one million records, focuses on three key targets: invalid addresses, invalid director information, and invalid founder information. The analysis prioritizes young companies (≤ 3 years old) with fewer than 100 employees, thereby improving class distributions and model effectiveness. A combination of binary classification techniques was employed, including benchmarked supervised learning models (XGBoost, Random Forest), anomaly detection methods (LOF, Isolation Forest), and semi-supervised learning using deep neural networks (DNNs) with unlabeled data. Given its computational efficiency, XGBoost was selected as the primary model. However, class imbalance persisted even among young companies, necessitating the integration of focal loss to improve classification performance. To further enhance accuracy while maintaining model interpretability, NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) was used for multi-objective hyperparameter optimization of XGBoost. The objectives were to maximize ROC-AUC for improved predictive performance and minimize the number of trees to enhance interpretability. The optimized model achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.9417, compared to 0.9161 without optimization, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach. Additionally, SHAP analysis provided insights into key factors influencing non-compliance, supporting explainability and aiding regulatory decision-making. This methodology contributes to fair and efficient oversight by reducing unnecessary inspections, minimizing disruptions to compliant businesses, and improving the overall effectiveness of tax compliance monitoring.

Indexed as

anomaly detectioncompany datamachine learningtax complianceXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41180826
PMCPMC12571755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.