ArticleCase reports in hematology2025
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Characterized by Rare
Article in Case reports in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Monotherapy, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib (INCB054828) in Subjects With Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms With FGFR1 Rearrangement - (FIGHT-203)
A Multicenter, Phase 1, Open-Label Study of the FGFR Inhibitor Pemigatinib (INCB054828) Administered After Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With Adverse or Intermediate Risk Cytogenetics
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Case: We present the case of a 60-year-old male patient with a common B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who carried the rare t(8; 22)(p11; q11) Background/Objectives: The presence of the t(8; 22)(p11; q11) Methods: The patient was treated according to the German Multicenter ALL (GMALL) Study Group consensus recommendations. The disease was refractory to the first cycle of induction chemotherapy. However, after the second induction, cytological remission was achieved. Nevertheless, minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity persisted (IGH rearrangement detected by PCR) after the first consolidation therapy, giving indication for a stem cell transplantation (SCT). Results: Thirty days post-transplant, no MRD was detected, and complete chimerism was measured for the months following transplantation. However, the patient died in the context of severe graft-versus-host disease and infectious complications 6 months after the SCT. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of detailed molecular analysis in the initial diagnostics of ALL. Identification of specific chromosomal translocations can provide critical insights for risk assessment and aid decision-making in intensify therapeutic approaches. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03011372, NCT04659616.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.