ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease: Current applications and future directions.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Care of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An International Survey.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Current Perspectives on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis of Microbiota and the Gut-Brain Axis, and Emerging Therapeutics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Integrated Assessment of Intestinal Barrier Function and Microscopic Inflammation Using Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Relapse Prediction in Ulcerative Colitis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents a major global health concern, significantly impacting patient quality of life and healthcare systems. Mucosal and histological healing have emerged as key therapeutic targets, offering better long-term outcomes compared with previous targets. However, accurate disease assessment remains challenging because of interobserver variability and inconsistencies between endoscopic and histological findings. Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming IBD care by enhancing the precision and reproducibility of disease evaluation. This review provided a structured synthesis of AI applications in IBD, organized by diagnostic, histological, and therapeutic domains, and highlighted comparative model performance such as machine learning classifiers (random forest, support vector machine) and deep learning models (convolutional and recurrent neural networks) with reported accuracy between 80% and 97% and areas under the curve ranging from 0.74 to 0.99. Beyond summarizing existing tools, the review emphasized the ability of AI to reduce diagnostic variability, improve early prediction of therapeutic response, and streamline clinical workflows. These advancements support a shift toward personalized treatment strategies and more efficient care delivery. Additionally, we outlined the expanding role of AI in clinical trials in which it supports patient stratification, endpoint prediction, and automated data integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.