ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Optimizing circumferential prolapsed hemorrhoid surgery: Transverse incision with longitudinal ligation procedure delivers superior radicality compared to Milligan-Morgan technique.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Transverse incision with longitudinal ligation procedure: Innovation, pitfalls, and clinical perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCircumferential prolapsed hemorrhoids (CPHs) necessitate surgical intervention. While Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) remains widely used, it compromises functional preservation and associates with significant postoperative pain, edema, and delayed healing in severe CPH cases. To address these limitations, our research team innovatively proposed the transverse incision with longitudinal ligation procedure (TILL). This novel technique utilizes targeted transverse incisions and longitudinal pedicle ligation to optimize complete resection while preserving anal anatomy and function.
aimTo optimize CPH resection and anal function preservation through comparative efficacy-safety evaluation of TILL
methodsA total of 180 patients were retrospectively reviewed in China. The patients were divided into two groups of 90 based on the surgical methods. The treatment group underwent the TILL procedure, while the control group underwent MMH. The main observation index was the evaluation of clinical efficacy after wound healing. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate and wound healing time. Safety measurements were also evaluated.
resultsThe TILL group showed a significant difference compared to the MMH group (
conclusionTILL demonstrates superior efficacy to MMH for advanced CPH, reducing recovery times and postoperative pain, edema, and stenosis while preserving anal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.