Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180720›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive marker for breast cancer treatment outcomes: a narrative review.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi ObeaguDepartment of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4538-0161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic inflammatory markers have gained prominence in cancer research for their prognostic and predictive potential. Among these, the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) has emerged as a possible indicator of treatment outcomes in breast cancer. This narrative review explores the current evidence regarding MLR as a predictive marker in breast cancer, highlighting its biological rationale, associations with treatment response, and potential clinical relevance. A selective literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies published up to May 2025. Search terms included "monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio," "MLR," "breast cancer," "prognosis," and "treatment response." Articles were selected based on thematic relevance to breast cancer and MLR. Reference lists of key articles were also screened to identify additional sources. No formal quality appraisal tool was applied, as this review does not follow a systematic review framework. The reviewed studies suggest that elevated pre-treatment MLR is associated with poorer outcomes across various breast cancer subtypes and treatment modalities. However, heterogeneity in study design, MLR cut-offs, and patient populations limits direct comparability. MLR represents a promising, readily accessible biomarker with potential applications in breast cancer prognostication and therapy monitoring. Further prospective studies are required to standardize cut-off values and validate clinical utility.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemotherapy responseimmunotherapymonocyte-to-lymphocyte ratioprognostic biomarker

Identifiers

PMID41180720
PMCPMC12577881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.