Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180716›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in cesarean section: emerging techniques and evidence-based strategies - a narrative review.

Melna Mathew, Yara M Manah, Prerna Ahuja, Arushi R Shetty, Tsnate E Taye, Veronica Rajahram, Monica Nalla, Dwivid Sooklal, Bhavana R Metukuru, Aiman Naveed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melna MathewDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, Maharashtra, India.
Yara M ManahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Prerna AhujaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arushi R ShettyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, Maharashtra, India.
Tsnate E TayeDepartment of Internal Medicine, MyungSung Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8588-1906
Veronica RajahramDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad.
Monica NallaDepartment of Internal Medicine and General Surgery, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, India.
Dwivid SooklalDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad.
Bhavana R MetukuruDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Telangana, India.
Aiman NaveedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal hypotension is a prominent adverse effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) in women undergoing cesarean sections (C-sections). It significantly impacts maternal and fetal well-being, emphasizing the need for effective management strategies. This article reviews the current management guidelines and analyzes the existing literature to shed light on the emerging approaches for managing SA-induced hypotension. Management strategies range from prophylactic measures, such as maternal repositioning and leg wrapping, to more extensive interventions, including fluid administration, vasopressors, and adjustment of anesthetic dosage. The management approach is also influenced by maternal conditions like diabetes, preeclampsia, and chronic kidney disease, as the factors contributing to blood pressure changes in these conditions guide the management of hypotension accordingly. The optimal strategy of choice is dictated by multiple factors including the degree of hypotension, maternal comorbid conditions, and the balance between the benefits and risks of the chosen method. The preferred approach should be tailored to the individual patient's needs and characteristics while also considering its impact on the fetus. Previous studies have shown that prophylactic administration of fluids, especially colloids, as they are proven to be more effective than crystalloids, and the judicious use of vasopressors like phenylephrine in conjunction with ondansetron, along with lowering the anesthetic dose, can significantly reduce the incidence of SA-induced hypotension and the potential adverse maternal and fetal implications.

Indexed as

cesarean sectioncolloidscrystalloidshypotensionspinal anesthesiavasopressors

Identifiers

PMID41180716
PMCPMC12578079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.