ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Integrating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio into cervical cancer management: implications for prognostic assessment and therapeutic strategies - a narrative review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory and nutritional markers in patients with resectable colon cancer: a retrospective observational study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a significant global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a readily accessible and cost-effective inflammatory marker, has emerged as a potential prognostic indicator in various malignancies, including cervical cancer. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on the clinical relevance of NLR in cervical cancer, elucidate its underlying immunological mechanisms, and explore its implications for prognostic assessment and therapeutic decision-making. Relevant literature was identified through a comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Emphasis was placed on studies investigating the prognostic value of NLR in cervical cancer patients, as well as those exploring the biological rationale linking inflammation and tumor progression. Elevated NLR is consistently associated with poorer survival outcomes, advanced disease stages, lymph node metastasis, and reduced treatment response in cervical cancer patients. Mechanistically, increased neutrophil counts reflect a pro-tumorigenic inflammatory state driven by cytokines such as IL-6 and VEGF, while decreased lymphocyte levels indicate compromised anti-tumor immunity. Additionally, human papillomavirus oncoproteins E6 and E7 contribute to immune evasion and may indirectly influence NLR levels. NLR holds promise as a prognostic biomarker in cervical cancer. However, significant variability in study design, cut-off values, and confounding factors limits its clinical applicability. Standardization of NLR assessment and further validation through large-scale, prospective studies are needed before routine implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.