ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Ethical considerations in surgical care: cultural and religious perspectives in Africa.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical care in the continent of Africa encounters a wide array of issues, comprising a lack of access to emergency and essential surgery. Optimal pre-, peri-, and post-operative care is guided by the four pillars of medical ethics: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. This may not be the case for low-resource domiciles as issues circumventing low literacy levels, poor infrastructure, poverty, and inequities in social health are cumbersome. Moreover, there is no homogeneity in the cultures and religious diversity that Africa has to offer which has led to a variety of healthcare decisions being made alongside an influence on the relationships developed between patients and their healthcare providers. Objectives: This study aims to address the influences of diverse cultural and religious backgrounds in ethical decision-making in African surgical care. Moreover, the study suggests strategies for mitigating diversity issues through developing environment-based protocols that promote ethically acceptable and culturally sensitive local surgical care. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to explore the present state of surgical care in Africa alongside the ethical principles guiding surgical care and cultural/religious considerations that may affect healthcare decisions when establishing patient-provider rapport. The databases used are PubMed/MEDLINE and EBSCOhost. Our search terms were "surgical care," "ethical consideration," "Africa," and "culture and religion in Africa." This enabled us to meticulously look into the existing findings to develop suggestions based on the gaps. Result: The literature review demonstrated the complex interplay between moral principles, cultural and religious outlooks, and surgical care provision in Africa. Some of the strategies found useful in this case are strengthening health systems, resources adequacy alongside context-based directives as well as capacity building. Additionally, cultural understanding, active listening and appreciation of diversity is critical since patients will receive culturally competent care and minimize chances for medical errors. Conclusion: Tackling Ethical challenges in African surgical care requires multiple approaches that accommodate religion's diverse culture. To do this, healthcare workers must cooperate with community members and policymakers to develop policies for ethically and culturally acceptable surgical approaches. Further research is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.