ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
STEMI to stroke: bridging the stroke gap by cross-training interventional cardiologists.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke remains a major cause of death and disability around the world. Despite the proven efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in treating large vessel blockages, many patients, especially those in underserved areas, still cannot access this critical procedure. In this review, we explore whether interventional cardiologists (ICs), with the right training and integration into stroke care, could match or even achieve superior outcomes of neurointerventionalists when performing MT. Some evidence points to ICs especially those with prior carotid stenting experience and high procedural volumes achieving favorable results, including rates of functional independence and successful recanalization similar to those seen in traditional neurointerventional practice. Training strategies - such as simulation-based education, cross-specialty mentorship, and clear institutional protocols - seem to help address the technical and cognitive demands of MT. Bringing ICs into stroke care may, in many cases, help bridge geographic gaps, minimize treatment delays, and improve the overall use of healthcare resources. Nevertheless, these developments must be accompanied by rigorous credentialing processes and open patient communication to maintain ethical and medicolegal standards. Future efforts should explore hybrid training pathways, prospective studies to validate these models, and the role of evolving technology in sustainably expanding MT capacity. With proper supervision, interventional components could serve as an important addition to current neurointerventional teams in the mission to lessen the worldwide impact of stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.