ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Mitigating complications in peroneal nerve trophic flaps through superficial venous connections: a case-control study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peroneal nerve trophic flaps are essential in reconstructive surgery for lower limb defects, yet they are prone to complications such as flap necrosis and venous congestion. These issues are often linked to inadequate venous drainage. This study evaluates an innovative venous anastomosis technique to enhance flap survival and reduce complications. Materials and methods: A case-control study was conducted with 70 patients undergoing peroneal nerve trophic flap reconstruction. Patients were divided into an anastomosis group (n = 35), where the small saphenous vein was connected to the dorsal superficial foot vein ne work, and a control group (n = 35) without venous anastomosis. Complications, flap survival rates, cost-effectiveness analysis and functional outcomes were assessed over a 6-12 month follow-up period using standardized metrics and statistical analysis. Results: The anastomosis group exhibited a significantly lower complication rate ( Conclusion: Superficial venous anastomosis is a promising flap surgical technique that reduces complications and improves cost-effectiveness, without increasing long-term complications that affect flap function and long-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.