ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Intradural extramedullary spinal epidermoid cyst: a narrative review of predisposing factors, surgical challenges, and outcomes.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Spinal epidermoid cyst: Iatrogenic neuraxial anesthesia?]Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal epidermoid cysts (SECs) are rare, benign, and slow-growing lesions that can lead to progressive neurological deficits. Due to their rarity, there is limited consolidated data on their clinical features and surgical outcomes. This review aims to synthesize existing evidence to better understand the predisposing factors, clinical presentations, management strategies, and outcomes of intradural extramedullary SECs. Methods: A review of 29 previously published cases with confirmed histopathological diagnoses of intradural extramedullary SECs was conducted. Extracted data included patient demographics, predisposing factors, clinical symptoms, imaging findings, surgical approaches, intraoperative challenges, and postoperative outcomes. Results: Lumbar puncture was identified as the most common predisposing factor (27.59%), followed by prior spinal surgery and congenital anomalies (13.79% each), while 41.38% of cases had no identifiable cause. The thoracic and lumbar regions were the most frequently affected sites. The predominant symptoms were paraparesis (34.48%) and back pain (31.03%), with sensory disturbances, urinary incontinence, and lumbago-sciatica each occurring in 17.24% of cases. Gross total resection (GTR) was performed in 75.86% of cases, yielding favorable outcomes in most patients: complete recovery in 65.52%, significant improvement in 17.24%, and minimal improvement in 10.34%. Postoperative complications were uncommon, with 82.76% of patients experiencing none. Key surgical challenges included cyst adhesion to neural elements, risk of rupture, and difficulties in revision procedures. Conclusion: Early diagnosis, advanced imaging, and advanced surgical technique are essential for optimal management of spinal epidermoid cysts. GTR remains the preferred approach, offering favorable neurological outcomes with a low complication profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.