Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180577›Full record

ArticleChaos, solitons, and fractals2025

Prediction of excitable wave dynamics using machine learning.

Mahesh Kumar Mulimani, Sebastian Echeverria-Alar, Michael Reiss, Wouter-Jan Rappel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos, solitons, and fractals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahesh Kumar MulimaniDepartment of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Sebastian Echeverria-AlarDepartment of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Michael ReissDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Wouter-Jan RappelDepartment of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

Patient-Directed Computational Analysis of Atrial FibrillationR01HL122384 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WOUTER-JAN RAPPEL · 2015 to 2026
$5.3M
Machine Learning in Atrial FibrillationR01HL149134 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122384NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excitable systems can exhibit a variety of dynamics with different complexity, ranging from a single, stable spiral to spiral defect chaos (SDC), during which spiral waves are continuously formed and destroyed. The corresponding reaction-diffusion models, including ones for cardiac tissue, can involve a large number of variables and can be time-consuming to simulate. Here we trained a deep-learning (DL) model using snapshots from a single variable, obtained by simulating a single quasi-periodic spiral wave and SDC using a generic cardiac model. Using the trained DL model, we predicted the dynamics in both cases, using timesteps that are much larger than required for the simulations of the underlying equations. We show that the DL model is able to predict the trajectory of a quasi-periodic spiral wave and that the SDC activation patterns can be predicted for approximately one Lyapunov time. Furthermore, we show that the DL model accurately captures the statistics of termination events in SDC, including the mean termination time. Finally, we show that a DL model trained using a specific domain size is able to replicate termination statistics on larger domains, resulting in significant computational savings.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrhythmiasChaosDeep learning modelPredictionSpiral Defect Chaos

Identifiers

PMID41180577
PMCPMC12574552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.