Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180569›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025

Mental health trajectories and peer refugee helper engagement, among Afghan, Iranian and Syrian refugees and asylum seekers in Greece.

Michalis Lavdas, Gro Mjeldheim Sandal, Marit Sijbrandij, Trynke Hoekstra, Tormod Bøe

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michalis LavdasDepartment of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-641X
Gro Mjeldheim SandalDepartment of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Marit SijbrandijDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5430-9810
Trynke HoekstraDepartment of Health Sciences and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tormod BøeDepartment of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer Refugee Helpers (PRHs) support peers in humanitarian settings, which may influence their own mental health. This longitudinal study examined anxiety and depression trajectories among Afghan, Iranian and Syrian refugees and asylum seekers in Greece, focusing on how PRH status (paid/unpaid) and sense of coherence influence trajectory membership. The study included 176 adult, PRHs and non-helpers. The following scales were administered three times at ~4-month intervals: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Social Provisions Scale (SPS-24), Sense of Coherence (SOC-13), Perceived Ability to Cope With Trauma (PACT) and Brief Trauma Questionnaire (BTQ). Using latent growth mixture modeling, we identified two depression (high and low) and three anxiety (high, moderate and low) trajectories. The adjusted logistic and multinomial regression models indicated that unpaid PRHs were significantly less likely to follow a low depression trajectory (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55,

Indexed as

anxietydepressionglobal mental healthpeer supportrefugee

Identifiers

PMID41180569
PMCPMC12571684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.