ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Rising star editorial: Periacetabular osteotomy-Reliable outcome and expanding indications.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does travel distance influence short-term outcome after periacetabular osteotomy?-A cohort study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Rising star editorial: Periacetabular osteotomy-Reliable outcome and expanding indications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periacetabular osteotomy has evolved from a procedure limited to developmental dysplasia of the hip into a versatile joint-preserving surgery for a wide range of acetabular pathomorphologies. Large-scale studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in improving pain, function and quality of life, with long-term survival rates approaching 68% at 20 years, though modern refinements likely yield even better results. Apart from a precise technical execution, its success depends on patient selection: while patients over 40 years old were once considered contraindications, recent evidence shows that outcomes are more closely tied to the absence of preexisting arthritis than to age. Indications have expanded to acetabular retroversion and borderline dysplasia and advances in imaging and technique, such as limited soft-tissue dissection and refined pubic cuts, have improved safety and recovery. Furthermore, technical innovations like augmented reality promise to further enhance surgical precision in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.