Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180552›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Mixed reality enhances interobserver reliability in tibial plateau fracture classification compared to computed tomography, 3D computed tomography and 3D printing.

Tobias Dust, Julian-Elias Henneberg, Maximilian J Hartel, Tobias Malte Ballhause, Christian Arras, André Strahl, Johannes Keller, Anna Streckenbach, Karl-Heinz Frosch, Matthias Krause

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mixed reality improves agreement on surgical approach selection and patient positioning in tibial plateau fracture planning compared to CT, 3DCT and 3D printing.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tobias DustDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9209-5833
Julian-Elias HennebergDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Maximilian J HartelDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Tobias Malte BallhauseDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Christian ArrasDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
André StrahlDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Johannes KellerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Anna StreckenbachDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Karl-Heinz FroschDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Matthias KrauseDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Tibial plateau fractures present a diagnostic challenge due to complex morphology and demanding anatomy. Reliable diagnosis is essential for treatment planning and clinical outcomes. Prior studies showed benefits of 3D computed tomography (3DCT) and 3D printing (3DP) using CT-based systems, but the potential of mixed reality (MR) remains unexplored. This study tested the hypothesis that MR enhances spatial understanding of fracture morphology, thereby improving interobserver reliability and diagnostic confidence across modern classification systems compared to CT, 3DCT and 3DP. Methods: Twenty-two intra-articular tibial plateau fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthese [AO]/OTA type B or C) were assessed using four visualisation modalities: (1) CT, (2) 3D reconstructions, (3) 3D-printed models and (4) MR holograms (Microsoft HoloLens 2). Twelve raters (six junior and six senior surgeons) classified each fracture using AO/OTA, 10-segment and revisited Schatzker systems and rated their diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Interobserver reliability was measured via kappa coefficients and percentage match. Differences were analysed using one-way analysis of variance ( Results: MR demonstrated the highest interobserver reliability for all classification systems: AO/OTA (0.43 vs. 0.32 for CT), 10-segment (0.17 vs. 0.11) and revisited Schatzker (0.43 vs. 0.24). Diagnostic confidence for AO/OTA differed significantly between modalities ( Conclusion: MR improved classification reliability and diagnostic confidence for tibial plateau fractures compared to CT, 3DCT and 3DP. The effect was most evident in less-experienced surgeons, indicating MR's value for surgical training and preoperative planning. Further research should explore MR's integration into education and its impact on clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level II.

Indexed as

10‐segment classification3D printingAO classificationdiagnosticsmixed realityrevisited Schatzker classificationtibial plateau fracture

Identifiers

PMID41180552
PMCPMC12572947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.