ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Limited evidence on the use of fibrin clot as an adjunct to meniscal repair with sutures: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Fibrin Clot Augmented Meniscal Repair: A Technique to Enhance Healing After Bucket Handle Medial Meniscus Repair.Cureus · 2026Article
- Limited evidence on the use of fibrin clot as an adjunct to meniscal repair with sutures: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Meniscal tears are common knee injuries that often require surgical repair due to pain and mechanical symptoms. Limited vascularisation in specific meniscal regions hinders healing, encouraging the use of fibrin clots as a biological augmentation strategy. This study aims to critically evaluate the available evidence on the use of fibrin clot as a biological adjunct in meniscal repair with sutures and its potential impact on healing outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, encompassing the PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases up to April 2025. Studies investigating meniscal repair augmented with a fibrin clot were included in the analysis. Data extracted included study design, type of meniscal lesion, surgical technique, clot preparation and failure rates. Results: Eleven studies were included, comprising both retrospective case series and limited comparative studies. Most studies involved small sample sizes and heterogeneous populations, characterised by diverse meniscal tear patterns, surgical techniques and clot sources. Reported healing rates ranged from 43% to above 90%, but outcome definitions were inconsistent. A critical risk of bias was identified in most of the studies. Conclusions: The current evidence on the use of fibrin clot as an adjunct to meniscal repair is limited and inconsistent. Although some studies suggest potential benefits, the overall quality of evidence is low. Further high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to determine whether fibrin clot improves meniscal healing outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review. Clinical Trail Registration: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024614021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.