ArticleJournal of translational science2025
A decade of publication trends in the Mountain West Clinical and Translational Research Infrastructure Network.
Article in Journal of translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Mountain West Clinical and Translational Research Infrastructure Network (MW-CTR-IN) promotes junior investigators' careers Methods: We analyzed 1,554 peer-reviewed publications (1,141 from databases and 413 from non-database sources) published between 2014 and 2024. Publications were categorized by type and translational research stage using predefined criteria. Two independent coders classified the manuscripts. Gender and discipline differences were assessed. Results: From 2014 to 2024, 1,554 peer-reviewed publications were documented-1,141 database articles (68%) and 413 (31%) non-database outputs. Notably, publication numbers nearly doubled between 2020 and 2022 compared to previous years. Early database publications primarily focused on T0 and T1 levels (preclinical and basic research). In contrast, later years (2020, 2022, and 2023) saw significant growth in T3 and T4 research, indicating a shift toward advanced translational efforts. Males predominated in basic science (28% Conclusions: Rising publication trends underscore MW-CTR-IN's success in building junior research capacity and reveal the remarkable impact of both traditional and non-traditional scholarly outputs in guiding equitable, interdisciplinary training. The inclusion of non-database publications-such as guidelines, protocols, and technical innovations-offers a more comprehensive evaluation of academic productivity and translational impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.