ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Subtle ocular motor deficits in people with chronic whiplash associated disorder compared to healthy controls.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: More than 50% of people who are diagnosed with whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) will report symptoms 12 months and beyond after their initial onset. However, many signs and symptoms, such as dizziness, emotional lability, confusion, ocular movement abnormalities, and balance deficits, may not be directly attributed to the cervical spine and may be more consistent with post-concussive syndrome (PCS). Methods: A total of 15 people with chronic (>3 months) WAD and 15 age-sex match controls were recruited. They were evaluated on clinical tools commonly used to assess signs and symptoms associated with concussion and PCS, including self-report symptoms, balance, cognition, and vestibular-ocular assessments. All scores were assessed for differences between the two groups, and effect sizes were recorded. Results: All testing, except for balance, demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Within the ocular motion, 31/34 variables moved less efficiently in the WAD group. Using an exact binomial paired sign test, the likelihood of all eight ocular composite groups being less efficient in the WAD group is reported as Discussion: Patients with chronic WAD demonstrate subtle but significant differences in ocular movement when compared to a control group. They also demonstrated significant differences on measures commonly used in the assessment of PCS despite never being diagnosed with it. These differences may contribute to some of the ongoing disability burden that this population commonly reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.