Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180517›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2025

Cross-sectional examination of tobacco point-of-sale marketing practices by location and type of retail environment in the District of Columbia.

Melissa Hawkins, Charis Edwards, Bright Amenyo, Jackie White, Karima Boumatar, Paola Koki Ndombo, Carrie Dahlquist, Anastasia Snelling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa HawkinsDepartment of Health Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington DC, United States.
Charis EdwardsDepartment of Health Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington DC, United States.
Bright AmenyoDepartment of Health Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington DC, United States.
Jackie WhiteDepartment of Health Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington DC, United States.
Karima BoumatarDC Department of Health, Tobacco Control Program, Washington DC, United States.
Paola Koki NdomboDC Department of Health, Tobacco Control Program, Washington DC, United States.
Carrie DahlquistDC Department of Health, Tobacco Control Program, Washington DC, United States.
Anastasia SnellingDepartment of Health Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite national and state policy interventions and public health efforts in tobacco control, tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable death, disease, and disability in the United States. Point-of-sale marketing in the retail environment significantly contributes to tobacco initiation and use among youth and adults, particularly in communities with lower income. The aim of the study was to assess the retail landscape and marketing practices for tobacco products by location and retail store environment.

methodsThis cross-sectional study examined the retail landscape and marketing practices of tobacco products among a random sample of licensed retailers in the District of Columbia (DC) (n=264) from June 2024 to April 2025, including product availability, promotion, price, and placement. Predictors of marketing practices were evaluated by geographical location and store type for flavored and non-flavored products including cigarettes, cigarillos, cigars, chew/snuff/loose tobacco, e-cigarettes, and hookah. Data were collected using an adapted version of the Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS) instrument.

resultsThe most available products were cigarillos (80%, n=215), cigarettes (78%, n=206), and chew/snuff/loose tobacco (67%, n=176). Convenience stores were more likely to have price promotions [χ

conclusionsThere are differences in the way tobacco products are marketed and promoted across DC based on store type and location. Youth and adults in communities with lower income are at increased risk of being exposed to tobacco products and marketing. Additional studies examining restrictions on point-of-sale marketing practices, particularly price promotions, are important to complement regulatory interventions and policies.

Indexed as

advertisingpoint-of-sale marketingprice promotiontobaccotobacco controltobacco retail

Identifiers

PMID41180517
PMCPMC12579267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.