ArticlePeerJ2025
Agreement between BTS G-walk and GaitLab in spatiotemporal and pelvic angle measurements in active older adults.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aging impacts gait, a vital health indicator in older adults, reducing speed and increasing double support time, linked to falls and disability. The World Health Organization advises 150 min/week of moderate or 75 min/week of vigorous exercise, plus strength training, to sustain neuromuscular integrity and locomotor capacity associated with healthy gait patterns in older adults. While 3D motion capture is the gold standard for gait analysis, its cost and complexity limit use, boosting interest in portable inertial sensors like the BTS G-Walk. Yet, their accuracy in active older adults for spatiotemporal parameters and pelvic angles is underexplored, prompting this comparison with BTS GaitLab. Methods: Fifty-nine active older adults (aged 65-87, mean 71.2 ± 5.5 years; eight men, 51 women) were assessed using BTS GaitLab (200 Hz cameras, 400 Hz force plates, Helen Hayes protocol, 18 markers) and BTS G-Walk (100 Hz, at L5) during four 10-meter walks at comfortable speed. Spatiotemporal parameters (cadence, speed, step length, stance/swing/support times) and pelvic angles (tilt, obliquity, rotation) were compared. Agreement used intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), differences used paired Results: Spatial parameters showed strong agreement: cadence (ICC = 0.98), speed (ICC = 0.96), step/stride length (ICC = 0.90-0.92), with no significant differences for cadence and speed ( Conclusions: BTS G-Walk accurately measures spatial gait parameters in active older adults, ideal for quick clinical assessments where 3D systems are unavailable. However, its weak temporal parameter and pelvic rotation performance, possibly due to 100 Hz sampling, L5 placement, and algorithms, limits detailed analysis like stability. With a large sample and pelvic angle focus, this study supports G-Walk as a complementary tool in gerontology, while noting needs for improved temporal and angular precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.