Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180490›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Accelerated straw decomposition and mitigated methane emissions

Bing He, Yonglin Si, Chao Li, Limin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bing HeAgricultural College, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University, Jilin, China.
Yonglin SiJilin Agricultural University, Jilin, China.
Chao LiAgricultural College, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University, Jilin, China.
Limin WangJilin City Meteorological Bureau, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study discusses two challenges to rice production in China's cold growing regions: the slow decomposition of straw due to low temperatures in the winter, and the environmental threats-concentrated methane emissions and soil reduction stress-associated with incorporation in the spring. To address these issues, a field experiment was conducted over two years (2022-2023) in paddy fields in central Jilin Province. The outcomes of three treatments were compared: no straw return (CK), puddling with water to promote straw incorporation in the spring (T1), and puddling with water to promote straw incorporation in the autumn (T2). The results demonstrated that T2 significantly enhanced the straw decomposition rate compared to T1 by extending the decomposition period, resulting in a 2.9% increase in straw weight loss after incorporation and a reduction in total methane emissions by 32.3%. T2 produced a smaller decline in soil redox potential, thereby alleviating soil reduction stress. Compared to CK, T2 significantly increased the levels of nitrogen, phosphorus , and calcium in the soil. T2 also maintained greater root activity and higher stem numbers than T1. While the grain yield under T2 did not differ significantly from that of CK, the yield under T1 was significantly reduced by 12.7%. Thus, incorporating puddling in autumn accelerates straw decomposition, reduces summer methane peaks, alleviates soil stress, enhances nutrient supply, and stabilizes yields. This makes it a sustainable strategy for managing straw in cold-region rice systems.

Indexed as

AgricultureMethaneOryzaPlant StemsSoilChinaCold TemperatureSeasonsMethaneSoilCold-region rice cultivationMethane emissionsRice straw incorporationSoil redox potentialStraw decompositionYield stability

Identifiers

PMID41180490
PMCPMC12574589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.