Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180444›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025

Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor in Pregnancy: A Case Series and Review of Literature.

Sajad Ahmad Para, Shayista Gull, Faiz Manzar Ansari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sajad Ahmad ParaDepartment of Urology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, C- Quarter Soura Srinagar, Srinagar, 190011 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-369X
Shayista GullDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, 190011 India.
Faiz Manzar AnsariSher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bladder malignancy is uncommon during pregnancy, and there is paucity in the literature about the optimal management. Endoscopic procedures and use of energy sources within bladder always pose a significant risk to pregnancy. Bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor allows precise resection, minimizes collateral damage and allows complete resection of tumor. In this retrospective study, we analyze the safety and efficacy of bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor in the management of bladder tumor during pregnancy. Material and methods: This is a retrospective study over a period of 6 years carried out at a tertiary referral center. Pregnancy patients with bladder tumors underwent transurethral bipolar resection of tumor and any complication or adverse event during the procedure were recorded. Disease and obstetric outcome was analyzed to access the safety and effectiveness of this procedure during pregnancy. Results: Seven pregnant patients were with an average age of 38.5 ± 4.2 years and average gestational age of 21.5 ± 7.5 weeks underwent bipolar TURBT in last 6 years. Smoking as a risk factor was identified in one patient, and one patient had personal history of bladder tumor. Majority of patients presented with gross hematuria (57.14%). The mean resection time was 19.5 ± 8.9 min, and the average hospital stay was 2.5 ± 0.5 days. There was no major complication recorded in intraoperative or postoperative period. Conclusion: Bipolar TURBT is safe and effective in the management of bladder tumor during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Bipolar TURBTBladder tumorPregnancyTransurethral resection of bladder tumor

Identifiers

PMID41180444
PMCPMC12579092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.