Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180439›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025

Social Media in Obstetrics & Gynaecology: How Far can we Go??

Sujata Dalvi

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sujata DalviNowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6717-1643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, social media has evolved from a casual communication tool to a powerful platform for professional engagement, education, and advocacy -particularly in the field of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Ob Gyn). As maternal health, reproductive rights, and gynaecologic care continue to occupy central roles in public discourse, social media offers Ob Gyn professionals a unique opportunity to amplify evidence-based information, foster community, and shape the future of women's health. Ob Gyn professionals have increasingly embraced platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube to share research findings, clinical insights, and public health messages. This shift is not merely cosmetic, but it reflects a deeper transformation in how knowledge is disseminated and consumed. Despite its promise, social media in Ob Gyn is not without pitfalls. This article explores the multifaceted impact of social media in Ob Gyn, from academic visibility and patient education to ethical considerations and institutional strategy.

Indexed as

InfluencersJournal visibilityOb Gyn practitionersSocial media

Identifiers

PMID41180439
PMCPMC12579029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.