Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180418›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2025

Integrating Rapid Cardiopulmonary and Gastric Ultrasound for Emergency Airway Management in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Series of Resident-Performed Echocardiographic Assessment Using Subcostal-Only-View in Physiologically Difficult Airway.

Nibras Bughrara, Megalan S Tso, Megan E Weigand, Dhruv H Patel, Ali Benismail, Abigail Rubin, Aliaksei Pustavoitau, Kunal Karamchandani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ten tips for a safe approach in airway management.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nibras BughraraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-8845
Megalan S TsoAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY.
Megan E WeigandAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY.
Dhruv H PatelAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY.
Ali BenismailDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.
Abigail RubinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.
Aliaksei PustavoitauDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Kunal KaramchandaniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTracheal intubation in critically ill patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may help with hemodynamic optimization and customization of management plans to the patient's tenuous physiology to prevent cardiopulmonary collapse. We report the integration of POCUS in the emergency airway management (EAM) of critically ill patients at a tertiary care academic medical center.

designOur study is a retrospective, exploratory research project. We evaluated the feasibility of using Echocardiography Assessment using Subcostal-only-view in Physiologically Difficult Airway (EASy-PDA) protocol to prevent peri-intubation hemodynamic compromise during EAM.

settingThis study took place at a tertiary academic medical center where requests for EAM were answered by anesthesiologists. SUBJECTS: The EASy-PDA protocol was performed on 30 patients with PDA outside of the operating room in need of EAM.

interventionsThe EASy-PDA protocol included the acquisition of subcostal four-chamber (SC4C) and inferior vena cava (IVC) images, supplemented by focused lung and gastric ultrasonography. Trained anesthesiology residents performed EASy-PDA examinations before airway management, and subsequently assigned hemodynamic phenotypes based on qualitative assessment of biventricular chamber size, myocardial wall thickness and function, and IVC size and collapsibility. Management was then tailored based on hemodynamic phenotyping. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe mean time to complete the EASy-PDA examination was 2.40 minutes. SC4C image could not be obtained in one patient due to severe abdominal pain. Images obtained solely via the EASy-PDA examination were sufficient to inform further patient management in 26 patients (86.7%), with one patient requiring emergent pericardial window creation and two patients requiring gastric decompression before intubation based on examination findings.

conclusionsWe were able to show the feasibility of integrating the EASy-PDA protocol into the management of emergent airways. In our case series, we observed that the EASy-PDA examination findings guided hemodynamic optimization before EAM in critically ill patients. This approach may help reduce intubation-associated morbidity and mortality. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of integration of EASy protocol during EAM on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementCritical IllnessEchocardiographyIntubation, IntratrachealStomachAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care SystemsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyanesthesiology trainingcritical careechocardiographypoint-of-care ultrasoundtracheal intubation

Identifiers

PMID41180418
PMCPMC12577978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.