ArticleCase reports in surgery2025
Delayed Diagnosis of Retained Surgical Blade 12 Years Post-Hysterectomy: A Rare Case Report.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Retained surgical instruments (RSIs) are rare but serious surgical complications. This report presents a unique case of a retained surgical blade identified 12 years post-hysterectomy, highlighting diagnostic challenges and the need for vigilance. Case Presentation: A 60-year-old female presented with chronic abdominal pain for 4 years, initially misdiagnosed as urinary tract infection (UTI) and gastritis. Investigations, including X-ray and computed tomography scan (CT scan), revealed a retained surgical blade. Elective laparotomy was performed, and the rusted blade, encapsulated by the omentum, was removed. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Discussion: The delayed diagnosis underscores vulnerabilities in surgical safety protocols. Nonspecific symptoms of RSIs often lead to delayed detection. While manual counting is the standard, human error can occur. This case emphasizes the need for advanced technologies and standardized protocols. Underreporting of RSIs obscures true rates, necessitating improved data transparency and systemic learning. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, technological integration, and institutional accountability to prevent RSIs. Enhanced postoperative surveillance and heightened clinical suspicion are crucial. This will improve patient safety and uphold healthcare credibility. This case underscores the need for long-term postoperative vigilance, even in the absence of immediate symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.