ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Working Memory Load-Dependent Cortical Mechanism of Distraction Analgesia in Healthy Individuals: An fNIRS Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on "Working Memory Load-Dependent Cortical Mechanism of Distraction Analgesia in Healthy Individuals: An fNIRS Study" [Response to Letter].Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Sweet taste stimulation reduced pain ratings associated with increased blood flow in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A pilot study using NIRS.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2026Article
- Commentary on "Working Memory Load-Dependent Cortical Mechanism of Distraction Analgesia in Healthy Individuals: An fNIRS Study" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: As a central element of executive function, working memory (WM) contributes to pain regulation by balancing cognitive resources between goal-directed attention and attention captured by nociceptive stimuli. Although WM load influences pain perception, its modulatory mechanism remains to be explored, particularly functional network interactions among pain-related brain regions during distraction. This study aims to investigate the effect of different-load WM tasks on pain perception via behavioral measures and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data, and to explore the underlying cortical neural mechanism. Patients and Methods: Thirty-five healthy participants completed experiments under synchronized fNIRS. In the first part, participants completed a laser stimuli pain-rating task. In the second part, a 2 × 2 within-subject design was used to assess the distraction effect on pain perception. Participants performed an n-back task during two WM loads: high load (2-back) and low load (0-back), while receiving stimuli (with or without laser stimuli) to their right hand. All participants completed trials in five experimental conditions: pain task, 0-back task, 2-back task, 0-back with pain task, and 2-back with pain task. Pain intensity ratings and cognitive performance (accuracy and reaction time) were recorded. Results: High load WM significantly reduced both the perceived pain intensity and nociceptive neural activation in the primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1) and secondary somatosensory cortex (S2). In contrast to n-back task, n-back with pain task showed a significant reduction in functional connectivity between brain regions within the high load group, including RS2-anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC), RSM1-right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC), RSM1-aPFC, and LSM1-aPFC. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for load-dependent cortical mechanism of distraction analgesia in healthy individuals. We conclude that distraction analgesia effect of WM may result from suppression of sensorimotor cortical activity and decoupling of pain-processing networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.