Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180365›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

Working Memory Load-Dependent Cortical Mechanism of Distraction Analgesia in Healthy Individuals: An fNIRS Study.

Rongwei Du, Mengting Lao, Meiling Cheng, Zhujun Wang, Zhouxue Zheng, Peishan Tang, Yingxuan Hu, Wen Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rongwei Du *Center of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.
Mengting Lao *Center of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.
Meiling Cheng *Center of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.
Zhujun WangCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.
Zhouxue ZhengCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.
Peishan TangCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-6046-9339
Yingxuan HuCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.
Wen WuCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: As a central element of executive function, working memory (WM) contributes to pain regulation by balancing cognitive resources between goal-directed attention and attention captured by nociceptive stimuli. Although WM load influences pain perception, its modulatory mechanism remains to be explored, particularly functional network interactions among pain-related brain regions during distraction. This study aims to investigate the effect of different-load WM tasks on pain perception via behavioral measures and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data, and to explore the underlying cortical neural mechanism. Patients and Methods: Thirty-five healthy participants completed experiments under synchronized fNIRS. In the first part, participants completed a laser stimuli pain-rating task. In the second part, a 2 × 2 within-subject design was used to assess the distraction effect on pain perception. Participants performed an n-back task during two WM loads: high load (2-back) and low load (0-back), while receiving stimuli (with or without laser stimuli) to their right hand. All participants completed trials in five experimental conditions: pain task, 0-back task, 2-back task, 0-back with pain task, and 2-back with pain task. Pain intensity ratings and cognitive performance (accuracy and reaction time) were recorded. Results: High load WM significantly reduced both the perceived pain intensity and nociceptive neural activation in the primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1) and secondary somatosensory cortex (S2). In contrast to n-back task, n-back with pain task showed a significant reduction in functional connectivity between brain regions within the high load group, including RS2-anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC), RSM1-right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC), RSM1-aPFC, and LSM1-aPFC. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for load-dependent cortical mechanism of distraction analgesia in healthy individuals. We conclude that distraction analgesia effect of WM may result from suppression of sensorimotor cortical activity and decoupling of pain-processing networks.

Indexed as

cortical mechanismdistraction analgesiafunctional near-infrared spectroscopypainworking memory

Identifiers

PMID41180365
PMCPMC12572738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.