ArticleBMJ public health2025
Community member perspectives on gun violence intervention in the southeast USA: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: South Carolina ranks ninth in the USA for its firearm death rates and black non-Hispanic residents are most impacted. The purpose of this research was to learn more from community members in the Charleston, South Carolina Tri-County area regarding steps to achieve a reduction in local gun violence. Methods: Researchers conducted an online survey of community members (n=153) using a community-based participatory research approach. The research questions were developed in collaboration with the Tri-County Gun Violence Coordinating Council. Community members were trained in research methods and involved in the design, recruitment and conduct of the study. Results: Participants ranked the most important approach to focus on as offering youth at risk for gun violence social resources and mentor services. The ranked order of approaches participants would like to see started first began with a public campaign to lock cars to reduce gun theft, followed by youth mentoring and building a database on gun crime. We identified significant differences in rating of importance and feasibility by demographic variables. Conclusions: Community members prioritised strategies that align with reducing community gun violence using a social determinants of health approach, yet demographic differences in preferences exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.