ArticleCJC open2025
Prescription Drug Coverage of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for People Living with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Canada.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) is cost-effective and is associated with significant reductions in morbidity and mortality. Yet, GDMT remains under-prescribed. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society's HF Working Group assessed formulary access to GDMT across Canada to identify differences in reimbursement and review how coverage aligns with evidence-based guidelines. Methods: An environmental scan was conducted for the period from June 2022 to July 2024 on the formulary coverage of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sinus node inhibitors in 10 Canadian provinces, 2 territories, and 6 federal programs. Results: In all provincial and territorial plans, patient eligibility and prior medication use criteria are required for sacubitril-valsartan reimbursement. Sacubitril-valsartan has coverage restrictions based on natriuretic peptides and prescriber qualifications, except in Ontario and Quebec. Carvedilol coverage is not a benefit in Ontario or British Columbia. Bisoprolol and spironolactone have universal coverage. Eplerenone is not listed in British Columbia. Dapagliflozin coverage is a benefit in all plans except Quebec. Ivabradine coverage has patient eligibility and prior medication use criteria in all provinces and territories and prescriber restrictions in certain regions. Two federal plans have universal coverage of GDMT. Conclusions: Differences in criteria for drug reimbursement create provincial and territorial variation in access to GDMT in Canada. Coverage criteria include prior medication use and prescriber qualifications, which are not supported by evidence-based guidelines. Systemwide changes in the funding of drug reimbursement programs are needed to improve access to GDMT for the more than 750,000 people living with HF in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.