ReviewCJC open2025
Continuous Pacing and Recording Technique: A Real-Time Feedback Approach for Left Bundle Branch Pacing.
Review in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07378124 (Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Lumenless Lead Versus Stylet-driven Lead in Intraoperative Application of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Guided by Continuous Pacing Monitoring With S-V Dissociation as the Primary Outcome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Lumenless Lead Versus Stylet-driven Lead in Intraoperative Application of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Guided by Continuous Pacing Monitoring With S-V Dissociation as the Primary Outcome: A Non-inferiority, Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left bundle branch pacing demonstrates significant clinical value in both prevention of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and resynchronization therapy following left bundle branch block. The current intermittent recording technique requires repeated interruptions during implantation to test parameters, increasing procedural complexity and time. In recent years, the application of stylet-driven leads and rotatable connectors combined with lumenless leads has enabled a continuous pacing and recording technique. This approach facilitates beat-by-beat monitoring of electrocardiograms and intracardiac electrograms during lead implantation, with real-time electrophysiological feedback provided to assist operators in precisely determining lead positioning and confirming left bundle branch capture. This technological innovation not only enhances procedural precision but also substantially improves operational safety. In addition, the continuous recording technique offers novel perspectives for electrophysiological research, potentially bridging cardiac pacing to advanced electrophysiological therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.