ArticleCJC open2025
Development and Validation of the CR-DECIDE Models to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Health Status in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guidelines emphasize individualized care in the management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to develop and validate clinical prediction models for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and health status among patients with stable CAD to support individualized, shared decision-making. Methods: For model development and internal validation, we used registries of outpatients with obstructive CAD on coronary angiography in British Columbia (2004-2015) and Alberta (2004-2020). Models were externally validated in ISCHEMIA trial participants with obstructive CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography. Outcomes included MACE (death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) within 3 years, angina-free status, and good-to-excellent physical functioning at 1 year, based on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Results: Median age was of study patients was 66-67 years, and 77% were male in both the MACE (n = 34,990) and health status (n = 13,312) model development cohorts. MACEs occurred in 9% (2026 patients) at 3 years. A 14-variable model had a C statistic of 0.68, calibration slope of 0.98, and positive net benefit in decision-curve analysis. At baseline, 41% were angina-free and 21% had good-to-excellent physical functioning, which increased to 64.5% and 72% at 1 year, respectively. C statistics for the angina-free and physical functioning models were 0.67 and 0.78, respectively, and calibration slopes were 0.98-0.99. In external validation, discrimination was modestly reduced and all models slightly underpredicted their respective outcomes, yet the MACE model retained positive net benefit. Conclusions: The CR-DECIDE models had moderate ability to predict MACEs and health status in patients with stable CAD and warrant further assessment of their impact at the point of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.