Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180298›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025

Evaluation of outpatient clindamycin prescriptions across a large military healthcare network.

Mark Derasmo, Kayla Scheps, Joseph E Marcus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark DerasmoInfectious Disease Service, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Brooke Army Medical Center, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2061-5311
Kayla SchepsInfectious Disease Service, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Brooke Army Medical Center, TX, USA.
Joseph E MarcusInfectious Disease Service, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Brooke Army Medical Center, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1789-603X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Despite concerns regarding toxicity and antimicrobial resistance, clindamycin prescriptions have remained significant at a large military healthcare system. This study evaluates patient and prescriber factors associated with outpatient clindamycin prescriptions. Design and setting: This study evaluated clindamycin prescriptions filled between January and December 2023 at outpatient pharmacies in a large military healthcare system. Patients: During the study period there were 1046 outpatients prescriptions for clindamycin among 972 adult and pediatric patients. Results: The cohort was predominately female (576, 55.1%) with a median age 48 [IQR 27.5-66]. The clinics with the most prescriptions were the emergency department (45.4%), primary care (23.6%), and surgical clinics (14.9%). While there were 533 prescribers, the ten highest writers of clindamycin accounted for 18.1% of all prescriptions. Beta-lactam allergy (38.5% vs. 16.0%, Conclusions: Despite local guidelines, clindamycin was still frequently used for a variety of indications in a large military healthcare system with high clindamycin resistance rates. Additionally, a small number of providers were found to be responsible for a disproportionate number of clindamycin prescriptions, highlighting potential targets for intervention for future antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

Identifiers

PMID41180298
PMCPMC12571677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.