ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Implementation of blood culture stewardship during a blood culture bottle shortage: a multicenter assessment.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Assess clinical outcomes, knowledge, and attitudes about shortage mitigation interventions during a nationwide blood culture bottle shortage. We hypothesized that efforts to target ordering of blood cultures would not change patient-oriented outcomes. Design: Retrospective, noninferiority, multicenter study. Setting: Tertiary, rural healthcare system. Patients: Eligible patients had any culture ordered before and after mitigation strategies. Interventions: Mitigation strategies were rapidly implemented to preserve the availability of blood culture bottles for high-risk patients. Interventions included best practice advisories, algorithms, cascade questions, hard stops, education, and communication. Results: The primary composite outcome (death during hospitalization, death within 14 d after discharge, return to the emergency department (ED) or readmission within 14 d after discharge) occurred in 603 of 3,174 patients (19.0%) in the pregroup and 1,496 of 8,232 patients (18.2%) in the postgroup ( Conclusions: Implementation of mitigation strategies during the shortage was not associated with differences in outcomes including mortality, return to the ED, readmission, or length of stay. Preliminary evidence suggests that outcomes may not be affected by the absence of blood cultures in high-risk sepsis patients. If proven in future studies, sepsis recommendations could be rewritten to accommodate pretest probability for bacteremia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.