ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Efficacy of a video refresher surgical technical assistance tool on surgeon performance of fasciotomies and proximal vascular control.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
- Can STAT video review replace operative experience?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exsanguinating hemorrhage is the leading cause of death in combat casualty care. With improvement in body armor, risk for extremity injuries is increasingly making surgical control of vessels and extremity fasciotomies critically important for saving life and/or limb. Yet, surgeon hands-on experience with major trauma has decreased. In military settings, with limited surgical resources, surgeons could be required to work independently and outside their scope of expertise. We explored whether just-in-time skill refreshment with video review improves performance of selected procedures. Methods: Surgeons (n=44) performed upper and lower extremity fasciotomies and axillary and femoral artery exposures on anatomic donors. They were divided into two groups: one group received Surgical Technical Assistance Tool (STAT) video procedure assistance and the other received no assistance (control group). Performance was evaluated using a five-component (anatomy, pathophysiology, patient management, technical skills, and procedural) Individual Procedure Score (IPS). The total number of compartment decompressions/constriction releases (maximum 10, combined fasciotomy procedures) and number of vessels controlled (maximum of four, combined vascular procedures) were measured. Each compartment decompression/constriction release and each vessel controlled are also single data points within the IPS. Results: In combined fasciotomies, STAT significantly improved the number of successful compartment decompressions/constriction releases as well as procedural, anatomy, and technical IPS components. In combined vascular procedures, STAT improved anatomy IPS, but not the number of vessels successfully controlled. For successful compartment decompression/constriction release, there was a significant linear correlation with procedural, anatomy, and technical IPS components. For successful vascular control, there was a significant linear correlation with procedural and technical IPS components. There was no correlation between success and pathophysiology or patient management scores. Conclusion: A video-based, just-in-time refresher tool can dramatically improve procedural success and performance scores in procedural, anatomy, and technical components during trauma-related extremity procedures. Level of evidence: Level II, Original Research, Therapeutic/Care Management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.