Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180178›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Metabolic score for insulin resistance and the incidence of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Ye He, Jiading He, Dongping Chen, Jianmin Xiao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ye HeDepartment of Cardiology, The Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Binhaiwan Central Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Jiading HeDepartment of Cardiology, The Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Binhaiwan Central Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Dongping ChenCentral Laboratory, The Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Binhaiwan Central Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Jianmin XiaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Binhaiwan Central Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading global cause of mortality, with insulin resistance as a pivotal metabolic risk factor that promotes endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and atherosclerosis via mechanisms such as impaired nitric oxide signaling and enhanced oxidative stress. The metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), a non-insulin-based index derived from fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and body mass index, offers a practical surrogate for assessing insulin sensitivity. However, its association with incident CVD has not been systematically evaluated in a meta-analysis. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the relationship between baseline METS-IR and the incidence of composite CVD, coronary artery disease (CAD), and stroke in adults without baseline CVD, including categorical, continuous, and dose-response analyses. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to August 2, 2025, for cohort studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using random-effects models to account for heterogeneity for highest versus lowest METS-IR categories and per standard deviation (SD) increment. Nonlinear dose-response relationships were modeled with restricted cubic splines. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias were assessed. Eight cohort studies involving 437,283 participants were included. Highest vs. lowest METS-IR was associated with increased risks (HR [95% CI]; I²): composite CVD (1.65 [1.36-2.02]; 85.6%), CAD (1.82 [1.50-2.20]; 59.7%), stroke (1.47 [1.19-1.83]; 76.3%). Per SD increment: composite CVD (1.16 [1.10-1.22]; 70.7%), CAD (1.18 [1.11-1.25]; 52.4%), stroke (1.13 [1.06-1.19]; 67.9%). Dose-response analyses revealed a nonlinear association for CAD (P for nonlinearity: 0.011), marginal nonlinearity for stroke (P: 0.072), and suggested nonlinearity for composite CVD (P: 0.145), with inflection points at METS-IR values of 40.56 (composite CVD), 38.24 (CAD), and 48.88 (stroke), beyond which risks appeared to accelerate. Elevated METS-IR independently predicts higher incidence of composite CVD, CAD, and stroke with nonlinear thresholds for CAD, marginal nonlinear thresholds for stroke, and potential nonlinear thresholds for composite CVD, despite moderate-to-high heterogeneity, supporting its integration into risk stratification and preventive strategies for metabolic health management. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251104293, identifier CRD420251104293.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesInsulin ResistanceBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsBlood Glucosecardiovascular diseasecohort studiescoronary artery diseasedose-response relationshipinsulin resistancemeta-analysisMETS-IRstroke

Identifiers

PMID41180178
PMCPMC12575141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.