ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
The lived experiences of postnatal mothers receiving birth companionship care in Katavi region, Tanzania: A phenomenological study.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the lived experience of postnatal mothers receiving birth companionship care in the Katavi region. Methods: A qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach was used to explore the experiences of eleven postnatal women who received birth companionship care during intrapartum. The study was conducted between May and June 2023, and postnatal women were conveniently sampled, with all participants providing their consent to participate. Data were collected through in-depth, semistructured interviews. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, which involved the following steps: familiarizing oneself with the data, conducting preliminary coding, organizing themes, creating an initial coding template, refining the template, and applying it to the entire dataset. Results: Six themes and twenty subthemes emerged in the current study. The main themes were (1) Choosing birth companions (BCs), (2) Mixed feelings about BCs, (3) Services offered by BCs, (4) Presence of BC during the intrapartum period, (5) Supportive infrastructure for birth companionship, (6) Challenges encountered with the presence of BCs. Conclusion: The study found that women who had a BC during intrapartum experienced mixed feelings. Some participants acknowledged the significant role that BCs played throughout the process. In contrast, others expressed concerns about knowledge and privacy violations and opted not to have a BC present during childbirth. However, they consented to their presence during the first stage of labor. The women employed various methods to select their BCs, who assumed a range of responsibilities in providing care, both formally and informally. It is essential to enhance community awareness of the importance of BCs during labor and childbirth, as well as to provide them with training during the antenatal period to understand their roles better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.