ArticleDepression and anxiety2025
Machine Learning-Based Identification of Preoperative Psychological Distress and Its Association With Adverse Surgery-Related Outcomes: Evidence From the China Surgery and Anesthesia Cohort (CSAC).
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many patients experience psychological distress in the preoperative phase, whilst screening based on cut-off points of assessment scales showed limited value in predicting clinical postoperative adverse outcomes. Methods: To identify preoperative psychological distress and investigate their associations with adverse surgery-related outcomes, we included 16,662 patients from the China Surgery and Anesthesia Cohort (CSAC). We applied dimensionality reduction and unsupervised machine learning algorithms to classify participants into distinct psychological patterns. We then assessed the associations of machine learning-identified psychological patterns and traditional cut-off based psychological symptoms, with various adverse surgery-related outcomes, using logistic and linear regression models while adjusting for other relevant covariates. Results: We successfully established clustering algorithms for 16,298 participants, demonstrating strong consistency in pattern features. Six distinct psychological patterns among participants were identified, including one group with normal psychological functioning and five groups with varying levels of psychological distress. All identified psychological distress patterns were significantly associated with most surgery-related adverse outcomes, both in short-term (e.g., any within-hospital postoperative complication, odds ratios [ORs] = 1.24-1.30) and long-term (e.g., cognitive impairment at 12 months postsurgery, 1.29-2.35). In contrast, traditional cut-off-based methods identified only 266 patients with significant psychological symptoms, which showed no association with some key short-term outcomes (e.g., length of hospital stay and postoperative complication), though they remained linked to most long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of machine learning in accurately identifying patients with preoperative psychological distress who may require clinical attention, highlighting the potential of these techniques to guide targeted preoperative interventions and ultimately improve surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.