ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
Severe invasive
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Improving outcomes among patients with invasive group A Methods: This was a single-center observational study conducted at the ICU of Donostia University Hospital, located in Donostia, Spain. The recruitment of all consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU by iGAS was carried out from January 2010 to May 2024 and divided into three periods: pre-pandemic (January 2010-2019), pandemic (2020-2021), and post-pandemic (May 2022-2024). The main outcome variables were ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and ICU mortality. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 25; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A significance level of Results: Sixty-eight adults were enrolled, with a crude mortality in pre- and post-pandemic periods being 25.5% and 10.0% ( Conclusions: The incidence of iGAS infections requiring ICU admission showed no significant increase post-Coronavirus Disease-19 pandemic. The highly toxigenic M1uk strain became predominant, but it was not associated with worse mortality among adult ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.