ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
Videoart in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study sought to evaluate the role of videoart in decreasing the risk of stress symptoms in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a general ICU in which 8 of 18 rooms are equipped with a videoart system. Competent patients who spent at least 48 h in the ICU were asked to complete an Impact of Events Scale (IES) questionnaire during hospitalization and at least 1 year after discharge. Patients were recruited from April 2017 until June 2020, and follow-up phone calls were made from June to August 2021. The primary outcome was an IES score indicative of significant stress symptoms during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were IES scores indicative of significant stress symptoms after discharge and clinical parameters during hospital stay. The cut-off value for high-risk stress symptoms was 26. However, because there is uncertainty in the literature regarding the desired cut-off value, two other values were also analyzed. Outcomes that were found statistically significant were further examined using a logistic regression model for the control of confounders. Results: Eighty-one patients completed the questionnaire during hospital stay and 24 patients after discharge. At home, patients who were exposed to videoart had a marginally lower mean IES score (median=6 [interquartile range: 0-18] Conclusions: There is a trend toward the beneficial effect of videoart for the alleviation of stress symptoms among ICU patients. However, further study is needed to examine the role of this technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.