ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
Methodological development of the remote ventilate view platform for real-time monitoring of patient-ventilator asynchrony and respiratory parameters in severe pneumonia patients.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07307066 (Real-Time Algorithm-Driven Ventilation Feedback to Improve Lung-Protective Ventilation in Patients With ARDS), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Real-Time Algorithm-Driven Ventilation Feedback to Improve Lung-Protective Ventilation in Patients With ARDS (REALVENT-study)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is common in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and may adversely affect clinical outcomes. Traditional bedside assessment methods are subjective and intermittent. We developed a real-time digital platform to continuously monitor ventilator waveforms and quantify overall asynchrony burden of severe pneumonia patients. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from December 2022 to August 2023. Ventilator waveforms were continuously collected and processed using the remote ventilate view platform, which automatically identified eight PVA subtypes and calculated the Overall Asynchrony Index (OAI) across the full ventilation course. Respiratory mechanics were also extracted. Primary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and 28-day ventilator-free days (VFDs), while secondary outcomes included the length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. The study used R, Jamovi, and Python for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-three mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were included in this study. No correlation was found between the index and ventilatory parameters, compliance, and disease severity. Patients with an OAI ≥10 % were more likely to have fewer 28-day VFDs (1.3 days Conclusions: A higher OAI and increased flow insufficiency were associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19 patients receiving mechanical ventilation. This study demonstrates the feasibility and clinical potential of a real-time, platform-based approach for automated detection and longitudinal monitoring of PVA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.