Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180100›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025

Comparison of hydrocortisone 100 mg bolus plus 200 mg/day infusion

Ukrit Jiradechpitak, Theerapon Tangsuwanaruk, Patipan Sitthiprawiat, Borwon Wittayachamnankul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Continuous versus Intermittent Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ukrit JiradechpitakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Theerapon TangsuwanarukDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Patipan SitthiprawiatDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Borwon WittayachamnankulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend the addition of hydrocortisone 200 mg/day for the treatment of septic shock unresponsive to fluids and vasopressors. However, the benefits of adding a 100 mg bolus to this regimen remain unclear. The study assessed the efficacy of the administration of hydrocortisone 200 mg/day with or without a 100 mg bolus in refractory septic shock. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with refractory septic shock treated at a tertiary care center between 2019 and 2023. Patients were divided into bolus group (receiving a 100 mg hydrocortisone bolus followed by a 200 mg/day continuous infusion) and non-bolus group (receiving a continuous infusion of 200 mg/day without the addition of a bolus) based on physician decision. The primary outcomes were the duration of vasopressor and shock reversal. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality and length of hospital stay. Comparisons between groups were performed using chi-squared tests, Results: A total of 184 patients were included, 149 patients in the bolus group and 35 patients in the non-bolus group. The median vasopressor duration was 1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-2) days in both groups ( Conclusion: The addition of a 100 mg bolus to a 200 mg/day hydrocortisone regimen may not impact clinical outcomes in refractory septic shock.

Indexed as

Adrenal insufficiencyHydrocortisoneIntravenous infusionSeptic shockVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID41180100
PMCPMC12572849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.