ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
Seeing Artery and VEin Simultaneously in the long axis (SAVES) for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary/subclavian vein cannulation: A retrospective analysis.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corrigendum to "Seeing Artery and VEin Simultaneously in the long axis (SAVES) for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary/subclavian vein cannulation: A retrospective analysis" [Journal of Intensive Medicine volume 4 (2025) 350-358.].Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation: should it be the preferred method for central venous catheterization in critically ill?Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The anatomical configuration of the anterior scalene muscle, inserting between the subclavian vein and artery, creates a space between them. By placing an ultrasound probe in the infraclavicular area, an optimal longitudinal view of both the proximal part of the axillary and the distal part of the subclavian vein and artery can be obtained, while the pleura is out of view. This Seeing Artery and VEin Simultaneously in the long axis (SAVES) method for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary/subclavian vein cannulation offers theoretical advantages because it may avoid iatrogenic pneumothorax and reduce the risk of arterial damage. The objective of the present study was, to our knowledge, for the first time, to determine the safety and efficacy of the SAVES method for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary/subclavian vein cannulation in adult critically ill patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on consecutive adult critically ill patients who underwent ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary/subclavian vein cannulation performed by the same physician in a medical/surgical intensive care unit (12 beds) between 20 August 2021 and 20 December 2024. The overall success rate, the first-pass success rate, the access time and number of attempts, the incidence of difficulty with insertion of the guidewire/dilator/catheter, and the mechanical complication rate were analyzed. Results: A total of 111 adult critically ill patients required 142 ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary/subclavian vein punctures using the SAVES method. The overall success rate was 100%, and the first-pass success rate was 75.4%. The access time was 38.5 (interquartile range: 21.5-80.0) s. The proportions of different numbers (1, 2, and 3) of attempted catheterizations were 88.7%, 9.2%, and 2.1%, respectively. The incidence of difficulty with guidewire insertion was 15.5%, while no difficulty with insertion of the dilator or catheter was experienced. No instance of pneumothorax, hemothorax, arterial puncture, brachial plexus injury, or cardiac tamponade was recorded. The incidence of hematoma formation was 2.1%. The occurrence rate of posterior venous wall penetration was 3.5%. The catheter malposition rate was 5.6%. Conclusions: The SAVES technique may be a safe and effective approach for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary/subclavian vein cannulation. A larger controlled prospective study is warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.