ArticleIndustrial psychiatry journal
Psychological impact of first vs. repeated cesarean sections: A comparative study on postpartum depression, anxiety, and stress.
Article in Industrial psychiatry journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregnancy impacts women's physical and emotional well-being, with cesarean births potentially causing stress, anxiety, and depression. Previous childbirth experiences significantly shape views on subsequent pregnancies. Aim: To Study the Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress In Women Who Underwent Their First CS As Compared To those with repeated CS. Materials and Methods: It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Ahmedabad. Obstetric-Gynaecological Department. It included 130 women, 65 who had their first CS and another 65 who had subsequent sections. After taking informed consent, Participants' sociodemographic and clinical information was acquired using a Performa, and their anxiety, depression, and stress levels were measured using three scales: GAD-7, EPDS, and PSS. Statistical analysis was performed using Excel and the statistical software SPSS. Results: Anxiety was significantly higher in rCS women (38.46%) than in fCS women (21.53%) ( Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasize the need for interventions like mental health support programs, stress management strategies, educational initiatives and early detection of mental health issues during prenatal care to improve maternal well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.