ArticleNAR cancer2025
Brain tumor classification from FFPE samples using nanopore methylation sequencing.
Article in NAR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Tissue Sampling Strategy on the Diagnostic Accuracy of DNA Methylation Profiling in Central Nervous System Tumors.Pathology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT)-based methylation sequencing is emerging as a powerful approach for the rapid and accurate classification of brain tumors, an essential component of precision oncology. However, its broader clinical adoption has been limited by reliance on fresh-frozen (FF) tissue, whereas the vast majority of clinical specimens are formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE). In this study, we address this limitation by evaluating the effects of FFPE processing on DNA methylation profiles and introducing a validated protocol for ONT-based classification using DNA extracted directly from pathology-marked regions on stained FFPE slides. This approach enables the targeted selection of tumor-rich areas following histological assessment, thereby improving DNA input quality and tumor content. We demonstrate that even small, low-input samples (≥25 ng) can be successfully classified using this method, with high concordance to final integrated neuropathological diagnoses. Our results show that, despite modest methylation loss associated with formalin fixation, classification performance remains robust. Notably, we identify a correlation between methylation degradation and fixation time, supporting a recommendation to limit formalin exposure to ≤3-4 days when possible. By enabling accurate methylation-based tumor classification from routinely processed, stained FFPE tissue, our protocol integrates seamlessly into existing clinical workflows. This expands the accessibility of ONT-based diagnostics and supports informed, timely treatment decisions-even in cases with minimal tissue availability or urgent clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.