ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
The Role of Ventricular Arrhythmias Inducibility in Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Ventricular Arrhythmias Inducibility in Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Brief Comment on "The Role of Ventricular Arrhythmias Inducibility in Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies".Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The identification of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients at risk for fatal arrhythmic events is of great importance in clinical practice. Conflicting data exist regarding the role of electrophysiological study (EPS) in this setting. We aimed to examine the association of EPS inducibility with future fatal arrhythmic events in ARVC patients and its role as a risk stratification tool in the setting of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Methods: This meta-analysis was prepared in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Eleven studies provided data on the association between EPS inducibility and fatal arrhythmic events and were therefore included in the quantitative analysis. EPS inducibility was significantly associated with arrhythmic events (RR: 2.15, 95% CI [1.63-2.85], Conclusions: EPS inducibility can be a valuable tool for arrhythmic risk stratification purposes in ARVC patients, especially as a component of multiparametric risk scores. More studies are needed to examine the role of multiparametric risk scores, including EPS inducibility, in identifying ARVC patients at risk for fatal arrhythmic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.