Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179977›Full record

ReviewCambridge prisms. Coastal futures2025

Closing the parachute and opening the umbrella: Strategies for inclusivity and representation in producing impactful coastal ecosystem research.

Katie May Laumann, Nicholas M Hoad, Lauren Alvaro, Shahrzad Lili Badri, Noirin Burke, Annie Carew, Guilherme N Corte, Aldo Croquer, Yasmina Shah Esmaeili, Martha Farrell and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Katie May LaumannIntegration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD, 21613, USA.
Nicholas M HoadNatural Resources and Sustainable Development, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-621 57, Visby, Sweden.
Lauren AlvaroNational Sea Grant College Program, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Shahrzad Lili BadriIntegration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD, 21613, USA.
Noirin BurkeGalway Atlantaquaria, Galway, Ireland.
Annie CarewIntegration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD, 21613, USA.
Guilherme N CorteDepartment of Marine Biology, College of Marine Sciences and Maritime Studies, Texas A&M University, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Aldo CroquerThe Nature Conservancy, Caribbean Division, Punta Cana, La Altagracia, Dominican Republic.
Yasmina Shah EsmaeiliDepartment of Marine Biology, College of Marine Sciences and Maritime Studies, Texas A&M University, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Martha FarrellMaharees Conservation Association CLG, Co Kerry, Ireland.
Naoko KouchiAmamo Works, Akkeshi, Hokkaido 088-1114, Japan.
Juhyung LeeDepartment of Oceanography and Marine Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, South Korea.
Masahiro NakaokaAkkeshi Marine Station, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 088-1113, Japan.
Lina Mtwana NordlundNatural Resources and Sustainable Development, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-621 57, Visby, Sweden.
Rita I Sellares-BlascoFundación Dominicana de Estudios Marinos, Bayahibe, Dominican Republic.
Ed SheldonTralee Bay, County Kerry, Ireland.
Maria F VillalpandoFundación Dominicana de Estudios Marinos, Bayahibe, Dominican Republic.
Jonathan S LefcheckIntegration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD, 21613, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parachute science is the problematic and extractive practice of non-local researchers taking data, knowledge and information from communities of which they are not members, failing to engage the local community and local scientists, marginalizing them in most aspects of the research, and using the results to their own benefit. Perpetuated by colonialism and unequal access to resources such as funding, education and data, it is harmful to local scientists and undervalues the contributions of the community as a whole. Ultimately, it erodes trust within the scientific community and, more broadly, builds dependence on foreign researchers and makes science less global and collaborative. Increasing international and cross-cultural collaborations while being careful to avoid parachute science can help minimize these impacts. Here, we offer our perspectives on parachute science and suggestions on how to avoid it, based on our experiences conducting research internationally with diverse scientists and communities, including both academics and non-academics. Instead of a parachute, we suggest opening the scientific "umbrella" to incorporate diverse perspectives and local contributions in generating relevant and impactful scientific insight.

Indexed as

colonial sciencecommunity scienceinternational collaborationparachute sciencetraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID41179977
PMCPMC12573691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.