ArticleInternational journal of public health2025
Trust Performance Indicators and Trust Stress Tests: A Conceptual Proposition for Trustworthy Health Data Spaces.
Article in International journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The European Health Data Space and biobanking in Europe: synergies, tensions and the future governance of data-driven health research.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of trustworthy Health Data Spaces (HDS) is currently in the spotlight of digital health policy. Diverse stakeholders agree on the importance of trust for the adoption and legitimacy of HDS. This emphasis on trust has led to the development of conceptual work describing what trust in HDS entails, along with initial suggestions on how trust principles can be operationalized in HDS governance and architecture. In contrast, little research has been conducted on methods to evaluate the performance of trust-building principles and the overall trustworthiness of HDS. In response, we propose two distinct methodologies that share a common focus on assessing trustworthiness: A) Trust Performance Indicators collect routine data related to trust-building principles. B) Trust Stress Tests support the design of resilient HDS architectures by identifying potential future scenarios that could undermine their trustworthiness. Through these methodologies, we aim to contribute to the ongoing development of trustworthy HDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.