ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Primary care and specialist physicians' prescribing preferences for concurrent probiotic-antibiotic therapy: a multinational clinical practice survey across 13 countries.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Probiotic Strains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Precision prebiotics: Engineering food-derived polysaccharides to target specific SCFA-producing taxa for neuroprotection via the microbiota-gut-brain axis.Current research in food science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic-induced intestinal microbiota disruption represents a significant clinical concern, yet physician practices regarding concurrent probiotic supplementation remain poorly characterized across international healthcare systems. We investigated physician attitudes, knowledge, and prescribing behaviors in 390 physicians from 13 countries concerning probiotic-antibiotic co-administration and evaluated receptivity to innovative probiotic formulations with a cross-sectional online survey conducted in June 2025. Sampling included random selection of direct email outreach to known internal medicine specialists, general practitioners, and family physicians. Participants included internal medicine specialists (42%), general practitioners (46%), and family physicians (12%). There was an overall response rate of 52%. While 98% of physicians demonstrated high awareness of antibiotic-induced microbiota disruption, only 37% consistently recommended probiotics when prescribing antibiotics, with substantial variation in co-prescribing practices: 7% prescribed probiotics to nearly all patients, 13% to 1-10, 20% to 11-25, 33% to 26-50, and 27% to 51-99% of antibiotic recipients. Regional variations showed Lithuania, Colombia and Peru had the highest co-prescription rates (50% of physicians prescribing to >50% of patients), while Finland demonstrated more conservative patterns (50% prescribing to <25% of patients). During cold and flu season, antibiotic prescribing rates were evenly distributed across physician groups but decreased substantially outside peak respiratory illness periods. Most physicians (68%) found probiotics useful when taken with antibiotics, with 96% considering them for patients with prior antibiotic-associated diarrhea history. Physician receptivity to advanced probiotic formulations was consistently high, with 92% welcoming products that could be taken simultaneously with antibiotics and 92% willing to recommend such products to patients with special concerns, indicating that while physicians maintain high awareness of antibiotic microbiome impact, probiotic co-prescribing practices remain inconsistent globally with regional variations reflecting differences in healthcare policies and clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.