ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Clinical performance of the pseudo-non diffracting beam Toric EDOF intraocular lens: visual function, rotational stability, and quality of life.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics of Patients Achieved Spectacle Independence After Enhanced Monofocal IOL Implantation Targeted at Distance Vision.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate visual acuity, refractive outcomes, rotational stability, and patient-reported satisfaction 3 months after bilateral implantation of the Lucidis Toric extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens in cataract patients with 1.00-3.00 D of regular corneal astigmatism. Methods: Prospective, single-arm study of 25 patients (50 eyes) undergoing phacoemulsification with bilateral Lucidis Toric IOL implantation. The primary endpoint was binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included monocular/binocular UDVA, distance-corrected VA (DCVA) at 4 m; intermediate (80 cm, 66 cm) and near (40 cm) uncorrected and distance-corrected acuities; defocus curve; residual spherical equivalent (SE) and cylinder; IOL rotation; optical quality (MTF cutoff, Strehl ratio, HOA RMS); contrast sensitivity; halometry; and NEI-RQL-42. Paired Results: At 3 months, the mean postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.17 ± 0.52 D (median 0.00 D; range -0.75 to +0.75 D) and the mean refractive cylinder was 0.04 ± 0.32 D (median 0.00 D; range -0.50 to +0.50 D). Median IOL rotation was 2.1 ± 2.3 degrees, with no eyes requiring repositioning. Mean binocular UDVA, UI80VA, UI66VA and UNVA were -0.01 ± 0.1, 0.08 ± 0.24, 0.04 ± 0.1, and 0.01 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuities at any distance. The binocular defocus curve showed visual acuity better than 0.1 logMAR from +0.50 D to -3.00 D. NEI-RQL-42 scores indicated high patient satisfaction, particularly in clarity of vision, far, near vision, activity limitations, and glare domains. Conclusion: Bilateral Lucidis Toric EDOF IOL implantation delivers stable rotational performance, broad-range uncorrected vision, and high spectacle independence in astigmatic cataract patients. Future randomised, head-to-head trials with longer follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.