Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179878›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

The advantages of NK cell vaccines in solid carcinoma clinical trials: conducted by various biology strategy and technology.

Yizhe Hu, Limei Leng, Bing Li, Qiang Qiao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yizhe HuAnsteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, China.
Limei LengAnsteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, China.
Bing LiAnsteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, China.
Qiang QiaoAnsteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review systematically discusses the latest clinical progress and challenges of natural killer (NK) cell vaccines in the treatment of solid tumors. By searching databases such as ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed (2019-2025), we focused on preclinical studies and Phase I/II/III registration trials in the past 2-3 years to dissect the mechanism of action and efficacy data of different vaccine platforms. The study illustrated: Dendritic cell-based vaccine platforms (e.g., ilixadencel), cytokine-based vaccine platforms (e.g., ALT-803), NK receptor agonist antibodies (e.g., AFM24) and mRNA/LNP-based vaccine platforms (e.g., BNT116) It has shown early efficacy in solid tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, and glioblastoma (with partial ORR of 30-50% and DCR of 80-100%), and the safety is comparatively manageable (the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events is less compared to T-cell therapy). However, complex manufacturing procedures, inhibition of the tumor microenvironment, and low targeted delivery efficiency remain the main obstacles to transformation. In the future, combinatorial regimens (e.g., sequential application of PD-1 inhibitors) need to be optimized, an iPSC-NK universal platform developed, and perioperative application scenarios explored. NK vaccines, by reshaping the immune microenvironment, will be an attractive strategy to break the bottlenecks in the treatment of solid tumors.

Indexed as

cancer immunotherapyclinical trialsnatural killer (NK) cell-based vaccinessolid tumorstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41179878
PMCPMC12575330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.